Health Alarm - An Open Letter to Health Freedom Advocates: Show Pictures of Blood Heavily Damaged by Nanoparticles from C19 Shots and Shedding; Create Strong Public Opposition to the LNP mRNA platform
Denial of this alarming damage and its causes weakens your case and fails to help millions of people harmed by the LNP package; worse than the spike protein.
Heavy-Metal-Laden Quantum Dots, Nanobots Assembling Fibers, and EMF Activation
Extensive Heavy-Metal Contamination
The German Working Group for Covid Vaccine Analysis, June 7, 2022, found toxic ingredients in all vaccine samples, most which were “metallic” and “cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process.” [my emphasis]
In her post April 3, 2023, Dr. Ana Mihalcea MD PhD lists numerous heavy metals she found in the blood of one of her patients, as an example of what she routinely finds. Far outside the reference range were aluminum, barium, and lead; well outside the reference range were gadolinium, platinum, thorium, and uranium; outside the reference range were antimony, nickel, thallium, and tungsten; and a bit outside the reference range were cadmium and palladium.
Dr. Mihalcea has reported many successes using IV EDTA chelation coupled with essential nutritional supplementation to clear her very-sick patients’ blood of toxic metals, misfolded fibrin, Rouleaux clumping, microclotting, polymeric/graphene fibers, and sludge. Her patients then experienced immediate symptomatic relief. Here are several examples:
Decontaminating the blood 4-3-23, Six cases + before/after photos
Hope Wins 6-28-23, Case study + before/after photos + treatment info
Complete resolution 5-13-23, Case study + before/after photos + treatment details
Darkfield live blood 5-13-23, Case study + before/after photos + treatment info
Literature review of EDTA 3- 24-23, Substantiations for EDTA treatment + A long list of supplements used, depending on individual needs
Clearly, for EDTA to do so much good, the toxic metals must be playing a major part in the illnesses her patients are suffering. The heavy metals of course have toxic effects of their own, but, as the following shows, much more is involved.
Quantum Dots and Fiber-Assembling Nanomachines in C19 vaxxes and other medical products
Dr. Mihalcea’s post of June 19, 2023, shows video examples, in darkfield microscopy, of bright dots changing color and moving to form “bubbles” out of which fibers grow into the blood, while the blood looks greatly damaged (one photo of this is shown above). To me, this image really does evoke such words as “parasites,” and it’s not far wrong conceptually. When I posted a comment that the bright dots look a lot like quantum dots, adding that Francis Collins wrote of using quantum dots in early 2020 to mimic spike proteins for vaccine development, she thanked me.
Quantum dots are nanoparticles composed of mixtures of heavy metals. They can be semiconductors due to quantum-mechanical effects at such small sizes. They also change color in response to EMF radiation.
As you know, semiconductors form the basis for computer electronics. As such, quantum dots can be structured like a simple computer chip to do preprogrammed things.
Two days later, in her post of June 21, 2023, Dr. Mihalcea began to mention quantum dots and reported that nanoparticles are already in use in industry assembling fibers in the manufacture of batteries and electrical components.
Crucially, they use Fe2+.
She reported work by Clifford Carnicom showing that iron in very-sick patients’ red blood cells had been converted from Fe2+, capable of carrying oxygen, to Fe3+, which cannot carry oxygen, making human blood look like “sludge” (see example shown above). Her patients say they feel like they are dying. [No wonder! This is AI “synthetic biology” caught “red handed” in the act of destroying human blood.]
Here are follow-ups emphasizing quantum dats and the namomachines they can create, with dates: July 11, 2023 July 12, 2023, and July 18, 2023, July 21, 2023 (with hydrogel using red blood cells as substrate—i.e., replacing it).
Self-Assembled Structures in C19 Vax Vials and Other Injectable Medications
The German Working Group cited above also wrote: “Complex structures similar to those in the vaccines were found in the blood samples of the vaccinated.”
Dr. David Nixon went further and recorded, in darkfield microscopy, what grew in C19 vax samples over extended time periods. Two examples are shown above. As you can see, they look like microchips with wires connecting them. [They have to be intentional; AI nanobot in nature.] Other photos can be found on his Substack.
His Substack also has entries showing photos of nanotech in dental anesthetics and veterinary products: May 14, 2023, May 21, 2023, and June 16, 2023.
Dr. Mihalcea shows similar hydrogel (polymers, such as of PEG) self assemblies and nano machines in Lantus insulin, Humalog, and dental anesthetics in posts dated July 25, 2023, July 26, 2023, and July 27, 2023. In her July 30 post, she shows a paper published in July, 2021, on nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots for use as biosensors and bioimaging devices. Her post of August 4, 2023, is headed: “quantum dots in long-acting insulin are assembling ‘rubbery blood clots’ made of hydrogel,” with a link to a video interview of her discussing and explaining details. In this other post of August 4, 2023 she links to an interview of her where she explains the research too (begins seconds after the 23 minute mark).
In other words, the nanoparticles that are assembling polymeric—basically, plastic—fibers that are damaging our blood are being put into injectable medications beyond the LNP mRNA C19 shots.
EMF Activation
Dr. Mihalcea presents photos showing that when a patient’s blood is placed in a micro-electric field, white fibers grow rapidly of the same polymeric kind as the very long clots morticians are reporting. Without the electric field, they still grow, but more slowly [As EMFs consist of electric and magnetic fields, and are now ubiquitous and growing in usage, power, and range of frequencies, I presume ambient EMFs are a prime suspect in stimulating/exciting/powering the fiber growth even without specifically applying a micro-electric field.]
Dr. Nixon reported that the structures that look like microcircuits in his photos did not form when the vax sample was placed in a Faraday cage, which shields the contents within it from EMF radiation.
Worsening Damage to Human Blood
Dr. Mihalcea has published many posts showing photos of extensively damaged red blood cells in all her patients; first, in vaxxed only; then, in unvaxxed; and the damage is getting seriously worse with time. Here's one such post.
Dr. Philippe van Welbergen, Medical Director of Biomedical Clinics in the UK, shows photos of extensive damage of red blood cells in his patients’ blood. In July, 2021, he saw just specks. In early February, 2022, his patients developed huge structures in their blood. And, worse, he finds the damage spreading “from the vaccinated to the not vaccinated.”
Steve Kirsch, citing FRED data (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey), is alarmed that what appears to me to be 2,000,000 people in the civilian work force—only in the ages between 16 and 64—who have become disabled since C19 injections began, over and above historical averages, with the numbers continuing to rise [my emphasis].
This growth of illness with time fits the pattern Drs. Mihalcea and Welbergen (and presumably others) have documented in which toxic nanoparticles damage the body both directly and by growing “synthetic-biology” structures in the blood, and they then spread via shedding to other people, including to unvaxxed people.
Caveats? Discounts to these reports?
Of course, other factors are at work too in causing increasing excess deaths, such as the spike protein, allergic and other reactions to PEG, plasmid DNA, ordinary toxic metals, and distortions of the immune system, but they are virtually invisible until they strike, such as fatal blood clots, turbo cancers, or top athletes collapsing. Blood, however, can be sampled easily; damage can be shown very visibly; and bloody effects are intensely shocking to most people.
Also, anyone could say that they don’t see people getting as sick as the patients Drs. Mihalcea and Welbergen see. However:
Massive media and medical censorship exist.
Medical misdiagnosing into known pigeon holes is commonplace.
And damaged blood could for many people be “only” debilitating, not utterly disabling, and so pass “under the radar.” In other words, the body has many methods of neutralizing and removing toxins. Some people have a lot; some, little. It depends in part on genetic makeup, and on nutritional factors that give the body what it needs to detoxify. I discuss a lot of the latter in my post Health Alarm Part 2.
Besides, how many doctors take and look at blood samples right then and there in their offices? I am told it is illegal to do so in New York State. In how many other states?
So people with damaged blood, though not necessarily as sick as Drs. Mihalcea’s and Welbergen’s patients but still suffering like the “walking wounded,” could already be far more numerous than it appears.
The key point here is that Drs. Mihalcea and Welbergen are seeing highly damaged blood in patients who never got a C19 injection. This indicates spreading via shedding of nanoparticles, with a retoxing of vaxxed people too.
Critically, that kind of contagion can start small but can grow exponentially into a massive health crisis, especially as
the LNP mRNA model is being incorporated into more and more “vaccines,” including for children, which can number as many as 50 injections or more,
and for livestock and the meat we eat.
AND nanoparticles are being inserted into more and more injectable medications.
So we must view Drs. Mihalcea’s and Welbergen’s patients as “canaries in the coal mine” and take their warnings very seriously.
That’s why I argue for showing damaged blood and showing that it spreads even to “unvaccinated” people. It makes the danger very visible, very alarming, and will cause large numbers of people across traditional political, class, and other divides to unite and push to ban the whole lipid nanoparticle mRNA platform, and ban nanoparticles in other injectable products.
Graphene Compounds, Failures/Successes in Finding Them, and Why It Matters a Lot
Graphene Compounds
“Graphene is an allotrope of carbon consisting of a single layer of atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice nanostructure” (Wikipedia). Graphene is widely reported to be very strong and a great electrical conductor.
Other compounds in the graphene family include:
graphene oxide (GO), which, strictly speaking, is fully oxidized graphene, and generally regarded to be a very poor conductor of electricity,
reduced—less than fully oxidized—graphene oxide (rGO), which can conduct electricity and may contain hydrogen, and
graphene hydroxide, and graphene hydrochloride.
Reading the literature, I find instances where what is called “graphene oxide” really is something in the family of graphene compounds. Sometimes the words change within the same post. I think this happens because detecting the exact form can be much more difficult than detecting something in the family of graphene compounds; or because several forms of graphene coexist in the same sample, which could also be very likely.
Graphene-compound arrays can be configured as large sheets, or layered sheets, or nanotubes, or quantum dots, or many other ways.
Crucially, graphene compounds have various electromagnetic properties. They potentially can act as antennae to receive or emit EMF energy. The former can transfer energy into blood or other substances; the latter, give off EMF signals. This observation is made in contexts of
powering the hydrogel and quantum-dot structures harming human blood as described above;
reports of people, even cadavers, giving off MAC addresses (to identify people, or to distinguish between “vaxxed” and “unvaxxed” people, for whatever purpose, such as forcing unvaccinated people into “camps” during a pandemic); and
multiple reports of magnets sticking to people, especially at the site of injection.
Further, Dr. Andreas Noack said graphene hydroxide (see below) acts like microscopic razor blades in the blood, cutting up epithelial cells that line blood vessels, and damaging the heart and other organs.
So the presence or absence of graphene compounds in the C19 “vaccines” is an extremely important question, especially for knowing what treatment to apply.
For example, NAC—N Acetyl Cysteine—is known to detoxify GO. That is, NAC, an antioxidant, reduces—the reverse of oxidation— graphene oxide and adheres to the surface of reduced GO, leading to GO’s removal from the body. Thus it "avoids GO-mediated oxidation of glutathione" (PubMed, 2019). For a longer, deeper list of nutritional ways to detox the many toxic elements in C19 injections, see the second part of my Health Alarm Part 2.
The Controversy
Karen Kingston writes (on June 23, 2023): “There are Freedom Movement leaders who claim that discussing nanotechnology will weaken efforts to remove the injections from the market when in fact, the exact opposite is true. The nanotechnology industry is barely regulated in America. Essentially the FDA, the consumer protection agency, and EPA all said, “We’re going to let the manufacturers regulate themselves.” [This means that] there are no laws or government agencies protecting Pfizer and other manufacturers from civil and criminal liability for [injecting] adults and children with engineered modRNA nanoparticles that are known toxic pathogens and electromagnetic devices.”
Karen Kingston followed up (on July 12, 2023). She wrote that Naomi Wolf and her legal team “got the strategy right” when they “sent a letter to the US Department of Justice rightly proclaiming that Pfizer committed massive fraud against the US government, not with the government.”
And she wrote on March 5, 2023, that Brook Jackson and her attorney, Robert Barnes, filed a $3 trillion false claims lawsuit against Pfizer.
Even though graphene compounds are reportedly in “everything,” including face masks, nutritional supplements, clothing, and other medical products, banning graphene compounds in injectable products would not be attacking the entire graphene/nanotech industry and ought to be doable.
Nevertheless, very visible Health Freedom advocates do go out of their way to deny that graphene compounds are in the C19 injections, and many others are silent on it. So here is an in-depth look at a few of their presentations.
Dr. Ryan Cole Did Not Find Graphene Oxide in C19 Vaxxes Because He Used the Wrong Methods—Mass Spectrometry (EDX Spectroscopy too) Instead of Micro-Raman Spectroscopy
A review of literature on graphene compounds quickly establishes that micro-Raman spectroscopy is a standard way of looking for them. In contrast:
Highly regarded A Midwestern Doctor wrote that Dr. Ryan Cole used “mass spectrometry” in looking for GO in C19 vax samples and found none, which convinced AMD of GO’s absence from all C19 vaccines (AMD’s substack post of 5-6-23, cross posted by Dr. Meryl Nass on May 11, 2023).
“Unacceptable” Jessica Rose wrote (12-17-22) that Ryan Cole “kills it” and included a link to Del Bigtree’s Highwire that no longer works.
I searched The Highwire for “graphene” and found a one minute 20 second clip in which Dr. Cole says with complete certainty, no doubt about it, very convincingly, that he looked at over 100 vials of C19 vaxxes and the “mass spec” did not show any graphene oxide. He also showed a graph with EDX spectroscopy that he said showed other things but not GO. That sounds very reassuring, and Del Bigtree, who said he wants only the science and went to Dr. Cole as his trusted source, was convinced. (I later found the original Highwire video, 1 hour, 19 minutes long. It is the source to which A Midwestern Doctor linked in his 5-6-23 post. The 1”20” segment came a bit after the 44 minute mark.)
Unfortunately for any much-desired reassurance, neither mass spectrometry nor EDX spectroscopy analyzes structure in any way, so they are invalid ways of looking for graphene compounds. Here’s why:
First, mass spectrometry is used primarily to determine the molecular weight of atoms and molecules. That tells us nothing about structure.
To quote John B. Fenn, the originator of electrospray ionization for biomolecules and the 2002 Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, as presented by a Scripps Center piece on the basics of mass spectrometry:
“To practice this art one puts charge on the molecules of interest…then measures how the trajectories of the resulting ions respond in vacuum to various combinations of electric and magnetic fields.” [my emphasis] The point is, under a given force, a molecule’s mass—its inertial weight—will determine how much it moves; heavier moves less; lighter moves more. The structure of the molecule doesn’t enter into the picture at all.
Further, Wikipedia says that energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (listed aliases include “EDX spectroscopy”) relies on atomic spectra excited by x-rays. Indeed, the graph for EDX spectroscopy depicted on The Highwire showed atomic elements. Well, graphene is carbon; pure GO is carbon and oxygen; and the graph depicted shows carbon and oxygen in the vax vials—proving nothing.
Secondly, a sample of 100 vials is no statistically meaningful basis for saying none of the “vaccines” contained any GO, especially as batches are well known to vary greatly; some are well known to be much more deadly than others. (One current estimate of highly toxic—”bad”—batches is about 5%.)
Thirdly, using mass spectrometry assumes that a molecule of, say, ascorbic acid, has only one basic form (plus or minus ions, whether right or left, etc.), and the result of mass spectrometry would indicate only molecular weight; that’s not definitive. Combined with EDX spectroscopy that indicates atomic composition, the result is more indicative, but still not definitive. And graphene species can be of any size and variety. So, for this reason too, mass spectrometry even with EDX will not give useful answers in looking for graphene species.
Therefore Dr. Cole’s conclusion that the C19 vaxxes did not contain “graphene oxide” (as if that is the only possibility), and his suppression of discussion of it (as when he silenced Dr Astrid Stuckelberger in the discussion segment at a Stockholm conference in late January, 2023) are three-ways invalid.
But wait! It gets curiouser and curiouser, but the conclusion remains the same. In the full original Highwire video, Dr. Cole says his colleagues in Germany—not he—used three different types of “mass-spec” and six types of clinical chemistry.
Penny Butler, who has done herculean work in posting many sources and points of view on C19 matters, reported on the full Highwire video. According to her, Dr. Cole’s reference to “mass spec” referred to “mass spectroscopy,” not “mass spectrometry.” (All I ever heard was “mass spec,” no details. That’s a red flag to me. It’s the kind of imprecision that inevitably pops up in videos, as speech and video are so much less precise and checkable than the written word.)
Penny Butler writes [I can confirm her version from viewing the video, but I didn’t write it all down]: “Simplified mass-spec according to Ryan[:} ‘everything at an atomic level has a mass, and a spectrum, so you literally have to destroy the sample and as it basically flames-off [they burn the sample], it will have a signature for its mass and its color that it puts off; so you can break one thing down into all the multiple elements that make it up.’” [my emphasis]
According to this way too, Dr. Cole’s “mass spec” is just an analysis for the presence of elements, not for identifying such a complicated thing as graphene compounds (and burning the sample does not tell us molecular weights at all). The conclusion of “no graphene oxide” is invalid this way too. And it just does raise serious questions of what people even mean when they spout jargon.
Worse, Dr. Cole often just asserted truths without offering any evidence at all, such as when he said that what looked like computer chips were just cholesterol crystals. (Never mind that Dr. David Nixon showed what looks like wires connecting what looks like microchips, and they formed or didn’t form when in or not in Faraday cages, i.e. shielded or not shielded from EMFs. Cholesterol doesn’t do that.)
Nor did Dr. Cole cite evidence when he and Del Bigtree strongly left the impression that all or almost all the metal contaminants were just from cheaply made needles and other metallic objects in the process. Never mind that the bright dots in Dr. Mihalcea’s photos shown above look exactly like highly structured quantum dots that congregate to grow fibers in the blood, while depriving blood of usable iron and turning it into sludge. Cheap metal flakes don’t do that.
Sorry, I’m not like Blanche DuBois, who frittered away a family fortune, her freedom, and her sanity because, as she said, she “always depended on the kindness of strangers” (A Streetcar Named Desire by Tennessee Williams).
I’m not buying wrong analyses and vague or irrelevant assertions, even when delivered as convincingly as done by Dr. Cole’s manner and by Del Bigtree’s bright assertions that he demands hard scientific facts. So why do they do it? I’m not a mind reader, but one logic of the objective situation leads to a benign though sad interpretation.
I infer that Health-Freedom-Movement advocates who want to suppress discussion of nanotechnology in injectable products are so beat up by the medical Establishment, which savaged them for using very well known and previously accepted practices, such as HCQ and IVM, that they have no stomach for talking about exotic new nanotechnological agents about which they know too little to speak authoritatively.
Fine, let other highly qualified people pick up the mantle; shutting them down is not the answer, for it weakens the case against LNP mRNA injections (and other injections containing self-assembling nanotechnology) by leaving out all the great harms nanotechnologies are causing, as evidenced by damaged blood.
Telling people about how our blood is being damaged by nanotechnologies ought to be something upon which all health freedom advocates can agree and succeed in using to great effect.
And, numerous highly qualified people did find graphene compounds in C19 vaxxes using such proper methods as micro-Raman spectroscopy (detailed below).
None of this, however, is intended to cast aspersions on the integrity of Dr. Cole and his fellow believers, nor on the great, courageous work they have been doing in fighting for medical freedom, nor on their correct positions on ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine (a zinc ionophore) plus zinc, vitamin D3, medical harms done by the C19 LNP mRNA injections, etc.
Rather, I try to take the approach to substantive principled debate most wonderfully demonstrated by Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr (and his colleagues) in their debate on the quantum nature of elementary particles.
The Einsteir/Bohr Debate As a Principled Approach to Substantive Debate
We know Einstein understood quantum behavior (in some ways like a particle, in other ways like a wave) because he was awarded a Nobel Prize in Physics for his explanation of the photoelectric effect (which involved quantum behavior of “light waves,” now called “photons”), but he disliked the probabilistic model of quantum mechanics (the wave function) that Bohr was championing.
So Einstein set out to find substantive holes in it, and, according to what I read when I was a physics major at the University of Pennsylvania in the 1960s, he did find real flaws in it. Bohr and his people accepted the criticism and improved their model, all of which came about in what Wikipedia calls “good-nature arguments,” just as I remember reading about it; and Bohr and Einstein “maintained a mutual admiration that was to last the rest of their lives.”
As of now, Bohr’s probabilistic view of quantum mechanics is deemed to be right; Einstein’s deterministic view, wrong. However, Einstein wasn’t wrong to look for flaws in it. Indeed, finding those flaws hastened the development of quantum mechanics.
In a similar vein, I hope this discussion contributes to uniting and strengthening opposition to LNP mRNA injectable products.
Graphene Compounds Found in C19 Vaxxes Using Raman Spectroscopy
In a World Council for Health Substack post (received 8-1-23, U.S. EDT), cross-posted by Dr. Tess Lawrie (8-3-23), Francesca Havens writes (accompanied by the disclaimer that she is expressing her own opinion): “Various academics and researchers have further indicated through RAMAN spectroscopy electron microscope techniques that graphene is present in the Covid-19 injectables, starting in 2021 with chemist Dr Pablo Campra of Almeria University, backed by many others.” She then goes on to list over 20 such names.
I don’t know how many of those people did the original research and how many cited the original research because they found it credible. However, that list clearly represents a sizable opinion of knowledgable people that cannot be dismissed as “lacking in credibility,” especially as the right technique was used, not a technique unable to find graphene compounds. Here, I’ll go into depth on the ones I have found.
1. Dr. Tess Lawrie, Medical Doctor and PhD, a cofounder of World Council for Health, commissioned a study by an independent UK laboratory that found graphene compounds in Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca C19 vials, using Raman spectroscopy.
Here is a WCF discussion in which Dr. Lawrie introduces Dr. Robert Verkerk, who discusses their preliminary findings. He concludes:“It’s pretty clear that graphite composite forms as undeclared ingredients are very common in the vials.” Along the way, he refers to German pathologist Professor Dr. Arne Burkhardt’s finding structures that in pathological examinations “fitted the description of graphene.”
This report (dated 2-22-22) from Children's Health Defense, Pennsylvania Chapter, on the above findings states: “The primary adulteration appears to be graphene oxide or a similar agent of those findings.”
Here is Penny Butler’s edited-for-better-readability version of Dr. Verkerk’s WCF discussion, dated April 19, 2022, which she labeled: “Update: Comprehensive lab report confirming Graphene Oxide findings in the injections,” indicating confirmation of the preliminary report.
She also added this link to an extensive discussion of graphene, including much more from Arne Burkhardt. That piece contains: “The [referenced graphene] quantum dots are attached to an iron compound (Fe3O4-NH2). This demonstrates a mechanism, on the drawing board in 2020, for becoming magnetized from an injection (vaccine?) with a graphene-based serum, regardless of the injection’s purported purpose.”
2. Dr. Philippe van Welbergen (referenced above on extensive damage of red blood cells in his patients’ blood) attributes the damage to graphene and “shedding” of it from the “vaccinated to the not vaccinated.”
3. Graphene and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) were found in Pfizer’s and other C19 vials using micro-Raman spectroscopy by Prof. Pablo Campra (associated with La Quinta Columna), published in his Final—not preliminary—report dated November, 2021.
4. German chemist Dr. Andreas Noack, who did his PhD on graphene, looked at Prof. Campra’s work and concluded he was seeing graphene hydroxide, according to this report by Penny Butler. Here is another report on Dr. Noack's findings.
5. Dr. Andreas Kalcker's team, working separately from Prof. Campra and La Quinta Columna, reported finding graphene oxide in C19 vials using “electron microscopy.”
[Dr. Kalcker has been accused of promoting a dangerous substance, sometimes derisively called “bleach,” but properly identified as “chlorine dioxide” (ClO2), to treat numerous ills, a treatment he called “CDS,” but is also called the Miracle Mineral Solution (MMS). He “has been investigated, sued and arrested” for using MMS, according to Wikipedia. However, the Wiki entry did not mention any conviction or punishment; CHD’s report mentioned him as credible; and Dr Kalcker still offers CDS treatment on his website. It looks to me he got the same kind of vile treatment gotten by U.S. doctors who recommended ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine plus zinc, and who warned about the C19 injectable products.
We can still ask if ClO2 can be beneficial. Yes, it can when used properly, according to this article of January 22, 2021, by Stephanie Seneff, PhD, published by the Weston A. Price Foundation.
6. Dr. Robert O. Young shows photos of extensive damage to blood, which he attributes to rGO and graphene hydrochloride, arising from C19 injections. He used microscopy that looks to me to be similar to, but more extensive than, Prof. Campra’s. This report is currently dated: “February 5th, 2021 – Updated October 1st, 2021 & March 12, 2022! July 7, 2023.”
[You probably won’t want to cite him because he is even more out of favor than Dr. Kalcker. Wikipedia says he was arrested, convicted, spent several months in jail, and had to pay a large civil-court judgement against him. Yet it looks to me that he probably was just pushing “alternative”—naturopathic—therapies harder than Dr. Kalcker did, and the medical Empire struck back harder. I’m citing his work because of his photos, which are consistent with ones referenced above. They show a true degree of attention to reality that I think bears consideration, even if you don’t want to discuss it publicly.]
7. It’s in this context of many findings of graphene compounds in C19 vials that Dr. Mihalcea uses such terms as “hydrogel/graphene” structures. She is looking at actual results of complex interactions and applying her knowledge to describe what she sees. Her many posts present evidence of harm from graphene, from polymeric hydrogels arising from such as PEG in C19 injections, from quantum dots, from shedding, and from environmental toxins.
Dear Health Freedom Advocates:
If you and your colleagues widely disseminate pictures of heavily damaged blood and microchip-like structures that are associated with C19 lipid nanoparticle mRNA “vaccines” and with shedding of LNPs, after you confirm to your satisfaction the facts of such damage, people will be moved strongly to demand termination of all LNP mRNA shots. This will save countless lives.
Otherwise, even though most people do not seem—yet—to be as sick as patients of Drs. Mihalcea and Welbergen, or as sick as the people counted in FRED disability data (both of which are cause enough for alarm), their worsening plights must be viewed as “canaries in the coal mine” who are failing and dying, portending worse things to come for the rest of us, especially as the LNP mRNA platform is being pushed into ever more human and animal “vaccines,“ most especially for all childhood “vaccines.”
DIY Nutritional Detoxing
For people who cannot get effective IV EDTA with nutritional supplementation from a highly qualified practitioner, I have posted a long list of DIY nutritional defenses and other pro-health actions people can take, including such nutrients as NAC, glutathione, NADH, vitamin C, zinc, etc., that naturally chelate graphene and heavy metals or help the liver and other organs detoxify them. (This DIY list is a slightly updated version of the second half of my post, Health Alarm Part 2.)
Note: I learned many nutritional approaches to cope with severe illness caused by the Swine Flu Shot of 1976. This is 50 years of “on the job,” trial-and-error training with many successful treatments, and a lot of duds—a self-controlled case study, virtually “blind” too because hoped-for results often did not “pan out,” while occasional real results, either good or bad, differed from what I expected.
Thank you for this great article. These are the first slide photos I’ve seen. I’ve been convinced graphene of some type was certainly in the shots. I’m certain they (shots) are causing these rubbery clots and now have an explanation of what’s happening. Very interesting and educating.
I have no doubt that the vaccines are dangerous and cause severe illness and death in many people.
I’m not exactly sure what to think about the possibility of nanotechnology in the shots, there do appear to be anomalies in the blood samples.... but even Dr David Nixon has said that some of the pics he took may have been compromised by imperfections in his cover slides, and it seems that the ‘experts’ can’t actually agree on what they are seeing.
So I’m going to keep an open mind on the issue.
I have a serious question (actually two of them). I’ve seen photos of what appears to be damaged blood, but with all the blood tests run daily worldwide (and with the huge numbers of people who took the shots) why aren’t we seeing many, many more of them?
And why don’t we hear anything about damaged blood from labs and the lab technicians who do the tests?
I’m well aware that ‘they’ are doing everything possible to cover up the disastrous effects of the vaccines, but you would think that censoring lab results and silencing the technicians who do the tests (not to mention the doctors who ordered them) would be beyond even ‘their’ capabilities if the blood damage is as obvious and pervasive as many people think.